Thomas Meyer
Impact in
- Dermatology top 0.5%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Microbiology top 1%
- Reproductive tract infections research
Papers in
- Epidemiology 50
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies 24
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 13
- Surgery 27
- Co-authors
- Eggert Stockfleth (41 shared papers)Enno Christophers (13 shared papers)Claas Ulrich (16 shared papers)Ingo Nindl (15 shared papers)Wolfram Sterry (12 shared papers)Tobias Schmook (8 shared papers)Lutz Pott (9 shared papers)Kirsten Bender (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Dermatology (9 papers)JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (9 papers)Cancers (4 papers)Dermatologic Surgery (4 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Thomas Meyer
121 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Dermatology 500
- Microbiology 351
- Epidemiology 1.3k
- Oncology 511
- Virology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Meyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Meyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Meyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Meyer. The network helps show where Thomas Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 137 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 111 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 99 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 90 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 85 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 83 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 78 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 72 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 67 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 66 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 66 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 65 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 59 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 55 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 46 |
About Thomas Meyer
Thomas Meyer is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Microbiology, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 128 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (24 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (21 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (13 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (13 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (500 citations), Microbiology (351 citations), Epidemiology (1.3k citations), Oncology (511 citations) and Virology (87 citations). Thomas Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Eggert Stockfleth, Enno Christophers, Claas Ulrich, Ingo Nindl, Wolfram Sterry, Tobias Schmook, Lutz Pott, Kirsten Bender, Rüdiger Arndt and Susanne Buder. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, Cancers, Dermatologic Surgery and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.