Thomas Metterlein

1.0k citations
42 papers · 453 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Metterlein

41 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Thomas Metterlein
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 97
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 84
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
  • Emergency Medicine 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 43
Replace Ming Tian with:
Ming Tian China
A. Hole Norway
Xiaoju Jin China
Weitian Tian China
Sarah Ciechanowicz United Kingdom
Sören Wagner Germany
Judy Bennett United States
Shinji Kohro Japan
Johannes Ehler Germany
F. M. Gibson United Kingdom
Thomas Metterlein relative to Ming Tian China Ming Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Ming Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Metterlein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Metterlein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Metterlein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Metterlein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Metterlein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Metterlein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Metterlein. The network helps show where Thomas Metterlein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Metterlein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Metterlein Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Metterlein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201446
2 201540
3
Cell harvesting method influences results of apoptosis analysis by annexin V staining.
201332
4 201528
5 201023
6 201020
7 201117
8 201316
9 201914
10 201114
11 201413
12 200713
13 201412
14 202112
15 201511
16 202111
17 200811
18 201010
19 201510
20 20119

About Thomas Metterlein

Thomas Metterlein is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (97 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (84 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations), Emergency Medicine (28 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (43 citations). Thomas Metterlein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Benedikt Trabold, Bernhard Gräf, Norbert Roewer, Michael Gruber, Martin Anetseder, Peter Kranke, Frank Schuster, Manuela Malsy, Frank Schuster and Petra Hofmann. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Muscle & Nerve, ASAIO Journal, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Journal of Inflammation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact