Thomas M. Larkin

22 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Larkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 143
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 464
  • Pharmacology 256
  • Surgery 198
  • Physiology 75
Replace David Abejón with:
David Abejón Spain
Lora L. Brown United States
Amol Soin United States
Nicholas Chua Singapore
Tilman Wolter Germany
Yakov Vorobeychik United States
Anthony Marsland Australia
Michael E. Frey United States
Elias Veizi United States
B. Lavignolle France
Thomas M. Larkin relative to David Abejón Spain David Abejón's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
David Abejón · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Larkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Larkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Larkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Larkin. The network helps show where Thomas M. Larkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Larkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Larkin Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Larkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010150
2
Pulsed radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglia is superior to pharmacotherapy or pulsed radiofrequency of the intercostal nerves in the treatment of chronic postsurgical thoracic pain.
2006100
3 200779
4 200370
5 200566
6 201855
7 200546
8 201145
9 201535
10 200226
11 200425
12 200423
13 200216
14 200316
15 201015
16 200112
17 20083
18 20073
19 20173
20 20231

About Thomas M. Larkin

Thomas M. Larkin is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (10 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (143 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (464 citations), Pharmacology (256 citations), Surgery (198 citations) and Physiology (75 citations). Thomas M. Larkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven P. Cohen, Scott Griffith, Connie Kurihara, Kayode Williams, Audrey S. Chang, Robert W. Hurley, Milan P. Stojanovic, Anthony Sireci, Christopher L. Wu and Matthew Crooks. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Spine, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and Pain Physician.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact