Thomas M. Clark

32 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Clark
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Insect Science 195
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 229
  • Ophthalmology 77
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 183
  • Ecology 121
Replace Ryuichi Yamada with:
Ryuichi Yamada Japan
Julien Pelletier United States
Michael Elgart Israel
T. Ikeda Japan
Maria Elena Pero Italy
Grégoy Y. Bédécarrats Canada
Patrick Scheid Germany
Keith Banister United Kingdom
Karen H. Berger United States
D.G.H. Halstead Italy
Thomas M. Clark relative to Ryuichi Yamada Japan Ryuichi Yamada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ryuichi Yamada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Clark. The network helps show where Thomas M. Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Clark Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Clark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200470
2 199953
3 201850
4 200447
5 200847
6 199843
7 199943
8 199740
9 199829
10 199926
11 200726
12 199626
13 200523
14 200022
15 200020
16 201319
17 199216
18 199816
19 201315
20 199814

About Thomas M. Clark

Thomas M. Clark is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (8 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Malaria Research and Control (2 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (195 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (229 citations), Ophthalmology (77 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (183 citations) and Ecology (121 citations). Thomas M. Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Susanna K. Remold, Timothy J. Bradley, David F. Moffett, Alan Koch, Klaus W. Beyenbach, Timothy K. Hayes, G.Mark Holman, Jessica Jones, Jeffrey J. Bara and William R. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Retina, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology and Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact