Thomas Lörch

14 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Thomas Lörch
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Biophysics 31
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 30
  • Genetics 37
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 26
Replace María del Mar Mañú‐Pereira with:
María del Mar Mañú‐Pereira Spain
Floris Chabrun France
Jack Bebiak United States
Anna Shpigel United States
Joseph Ardayfio United States
John Saul United States
Robert Koewler United States
Roy Pinkeney United States
Giovanni Mario Lujan United States
Lynda Hayashi United States
Thomas Lörch relative to María del Mar Mañú‐Pereira Spain María del Mar Mañú‐Pereira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
María del Mar Mañú‐Pereira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lörch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lörch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lörch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lörch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lörch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lörch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lörch. The network helps show where Thomas Lörch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lörch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lörch Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lörch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 199862
2 200542
3 200637
4 200321
5 202115
6 200314
7 200514
8 198412
9 202012
10 20207
11 20076
12 20234
13 20083
14 20223

About Thomas Lörch

Thomas Lörch is a scholar working on Genetics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health Informatics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 14 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers), AI in cancer detection (1 paper), Vehicle License Plate Recognition (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 paper) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (31 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (30 citations), Genetics (37 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (26 citations). Thomas Lörch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter F. Ambros, Petra Boukamp, Karin M. Greulich‐Bode, Axel Karl Walch, Manfred Bauchinger, Martin Werner, Horst F. Zitzelsberger, Michaela M. Aubele, Heinz Höfler and Ulrike Kulka. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Cytometry Part A, Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry and Chromosome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact