Thomas Lim

794 citations
28 papers · 631 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Lim

26 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Thomas Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Developmental Neuroscience 39
  • Finance 81
  • Molecular Biology 336
  • Biomaterials 58
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 71
Replace David A. Turner with:
David A. Turner United Kingdom
Stephen J. Fleming United States
Esther Rincón Spain
Yafen Huang China
Davood Sabour Iran
Hendrik Knoetgen Germany
Anna Q. Cai Australia
Bao Kim Nguyen United States
Xiao‐Jiang Quan Belgium
Thomas Lim relative to David A. Turner United Kingdom David A. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.6×
David A. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lim. The network helps show where Thomas Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lim Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006155
2 199164
3 199157
4 198753
5 200548
6 200647
7 200032
8 201128
9 201327
10 201224
11 200519
12 199819
13 199514
14 19986
15 20195
16 20195
17 19965
18 19964
19 20213
20 20153

About Thomas Lim

Thomas Lim is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Demography and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 28 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (9 papers), Risk and Portfolio Optimization (4 papers), Economic theories and models (3 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (3 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (2 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations), Finance (81 citations), Molecular Biology (336 citations), Biomaterials (58 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (71 citations). Thomas Lim has collaborated with scholars based in France, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claudio D. Stern, Roger J. Keynes, Idris Kharroubi, Guping Tang, Frank Alexis, Yi Yan Yang, Hejian Guo, Jeak Ling Ding, Shengjia Wang and Su Zeng. Their work appears in journals such as Development, The Journal of Gene Medicine, Journal of Experimental Botany, Neuroscience and Electronic Journal of Probability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact