Thomas Lescot
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Neurology top 2%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Louis Puybasset (27 shared papers)Lamine Abdennour (11 shared papers)Pierre Coriat (7 shared papers)Constantine Karvellas (3 shared papers)Anne‐Laure Boch (7 shared papers)Marc Beaussier (5 shared papers)Franck Verdonk (6 shared papers)Sheldon Magder (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Critical Care (6 papers)Journal of Neurotrauma (3 papers)Intensive Care Medicine (3 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Medicine (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Lescot
63 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 196
- Neurology 447
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 48
- Emergency Medicine 220
- Neurology 135
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lescot
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lescot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lescot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lescot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lescot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lescot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lescot. The network helps show where Thomas Lescot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lescot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 136 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 93 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 78 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 78 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 45 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 26 |
About Thomas Lescot
Thomas Lescot is a scholar working on Neurology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (26 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (8 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (196 citations), Neurology (447 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (48 citations), Emergency Medicine (220 citations) and Neurology (135 citations). Thomas Lescot has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Louis Puybasset, Lamine Abdennour, Pierre Coriat, Constantine Karvellas, Anne‐Laure Boch, Marc Beaussier, Franck Verdonk, Sheldon Magder, P. Coriat and Emmanuel Pardo. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Journal of Neurotrauma, Intensive Care Medicine, Scientific Reports and Journal of Clinical Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.