Thomas Klee

2.6k citations
52 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Klee

52 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Klee
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.6k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 629
  • Occupational Therapy 113
  • Sensory Systems 121
  • Clinical Psychology 481
Replace Richard G. Schwartz with:
Richard G. Schwartz United States
Tova Most Israel
Elise Baker Australia
Alison Holm Australia
Ulrika Nettelbladt Sweden
Jane L. McSweeny United States
Susan Rvachew Canada
Joan Kwiatkowski United States
Holly K. Craig United States
Linda Cupples Australia
Thomas Klee relative to Richard G. Schwartz United States Richard G. Schwartz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Richard G. Schwartz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Klee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Klee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Klee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Klee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Klee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Klee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Klee. The network helps show where Thomas Klee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Klee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Klee Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Klee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987305
2 1992128
3 1985116
4 1980101
5 199790
6 199087
7 200487
8 200080
9 199880
10 198674
11 200571
12 200868
13 198966
14 199860
15 198655
16 200949
17 200340
18 199333
19 201126
20 199326

About Thomas Klee

Thomas Klee is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (40 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (9 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (8 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.6k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (629 citations), Occupational Therapy (113 citations), Sensory Systems (121 citations) and Clinical Psychology (481 citations). Thomas Klee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include JoAnne Robbins, Stephanie F. Stokes, David K. Carson, Martha Fitzgerald, William J. Gavin, David L. Ratusnik, Anne Marie Tharpe, Kim Pearce, Debra C. Vigil and Paul Fletcher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Ear and Hearing and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact