Thomas King

2.0k citations
60 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas King

57 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas King
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Surgery 656
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 143
  • Pharmacology 184
  • Cancer Research 148
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 165
Replace Lu Li with:
Lu Li China
Eiko Yamamoto Japan
Herbert S. Diamond United States
William G. Murphy Ireland
Terence Tang Canada
Scott Gottlieb United States
Timothy Marsh United States
Sigrid Harendza Germany
Brendan Collins United Kingdom
Thomas King relative to Lu Li China Lu Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Lu Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas King. The network helps show where Thomas King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas King Line = papers co-authored together Thomas King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005190
2 2004169
3 1957144
4 1959104
5 1991104
6 201684
7 199480
8 201361
9 200454
10 200438
11 200535
12 202234
13 199232
14 199531
15 199928
16 201327
17 200524
18 202218
19
Experience with concomitant ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser treatment in chronic venous disorder and its influence on Health Related Quality of Life: interim analysis of more than 1000 consecutive procedures.
200917
20 195317

About Thomas King

Thomas King is a scholar working on Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Pharmacology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (8 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (6 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (4 papers) and Fungal Infections and Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (656 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (143 citations), Pharmacology (184 citations), Cancer Research (148 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (165 citations). Thomas King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Gerald R. Ferris, Joanne Palmisano, Christie M. Ballantyne, William E. Brady, Nicola Abate, Žhong Yuan, Michael A. Blazing, Donald B. Fedor, David J. Chang and Tara Erb. Their work appears in journals such as CNS Spectrums, The Medical Journal of Australia, Medical Mycology, Toxicon and Journal of Vascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact