Thomas Keyes

49 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 24
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 813
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 156
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 209
  • Spectroscopy 360
Replace V. Mazzacurati with:
V. Mazzacurati Italy
David E. Logan United Kingdom
G. Signorelli Italy
David Ronis United States
R. Vallauri Italy
N. C. Ford United States
R. Schilling Germany
Robert M. Mazo United States
S. Kielich Poland
Alessandro Cunsolo Italy
Thomas Keyes relative to V. Mazzacurati Italy V. Mazzacurati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
V. Mazzacurati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Keyes. The network helps show where Thomas Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972191
2 1972115
3 2006104
4 197198
5 197788
6 201078
7 197748
8 201446
9 200843
10 197742
11 197242
12 200740
13 201135
14 197730
15 198029
16 198727
17 197625
18 200924
19 200724
20 200720

About Thomas Keyes

Thomas Keyes is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Spectroscopy, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (23 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (18 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (9 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (7 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (6 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (24 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (813 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (156 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (209 citations) and Spectroscopy (360 citations). Thomas Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Kivelson, Jaegil Kim, Branka M. Ladanyi, John E. Straub, Toshiya Ohtsuki, Parminder K. Mankoo, Veronica Vaida, Steven M. George, Rigoberto Hernandez and Stephen Quirk. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Molecular Physics, Physics Letters A, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact