Thomas Kane

19 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Thomas Kane
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Ophthalmology 214
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 21
  • Molecular Biology 193
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 54
  • Cell Biology 35
Replace Sérgio Henrique Teixeira with:
Sérgio Henrique Teixeira Brazil
Kevin K. Veverka United States
Sibel Doğuizi Türkiye
Thomas Hammer Germany
J W Howe United Kingdom
Stephan Kremmer Germany
Carlos Filipe Chicani United States
Ya Shi China
Toshiaki Goseki Japan
Giulia Amore Italy
Thomas Kane relative to Sérgio Henrique Teixeira Brazil Sérgio Henrique Teixeira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sérgio Henrique Teixeira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kane. The network helps show where Thomas Kane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kane Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201950
2 201946
3 201942
4 201139
5 201938
6 202031
7 201721
8 202015
9 202011
10 201310
11 20229
12 20209
13 20196
14 20185
15 20192
16 20212
17
Natural history of foveal cone structure in RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)
20191
18
Twelve-month longitudinal study of remnant cone structure in macular telangiectasia type 2
20181
19
Longitudinal assessment of foveal cone structure in blue cone monochromacy
20201
20 20191

About Thomas Kane

Thomas Kane is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Restless Legs Syndrome Research (3 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (214 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (21 citations), Molecular Biology (193 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (54 citations) and Cell Biology (35 citations). Thomas Kane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Michel Michaelides, Angelos Kalitzeos, Michalis Georgiou, Joseph Carroll, Navjit Singh, Nashila Hirji, Alfredo Dubra, Richard W. Costello, Anthony G. Robson and Andrew R. Webster. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Journal of Nephrology, Clinical Nephrology and Ophthalmic Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact