Thomas Kane

430 citations
16 papers · 329 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Kane

16 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Thomas Kane
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Molecular Biology 270
  • Ophthalmology 31
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 21
  • Sensory Systems 2
Replace Navjit Singh with:
Navjit Singh United Kingdom
Preena Tanna United Kingdom
Nashila Hirji United Kingdom
James J. L. Tee United Kingdom
Melissa L. Kasilian United Kingdom
Michael J. Gale United States
Grace Han United States
Taro Kominami Japan
Denise J. Pearson United States
Tina M. Lamey Australia
Thomas Kane relative to Navjit Singh United Kingdom Navjit Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Navjit Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kane. The network helps show where Thomas Kane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kane Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201959
2 201953
3 201946
4 201945
5 202033
6 202332
7 202019
8 202014
9 202010
10 202210
11 20213
12
Twelve-month longitudinal study of remnant cone structure in macular telangiectasia type 2
20181
13
Natural history of foveal cone structure in RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)
20191
14
Prospective Cohort Study of Childhood-Onset Stargardt Disease: Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging, Progression, Comparison with Adulthood-Onset Disease, and Disease Symmetry
20191
15
Longitudinal assessment of foveal cone structure in blue cone monochromacy
20201
16 20241

About Thomas Kane

Thomas Kane is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (13 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (270 citations), Ophthalmology (31 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (56 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (21 citations) and Sensory Systems (2 citations). Thomas Kane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Michel Michaelides, Angelos A. Kalitzeos, Navjit Singh, Michalis Georgiou, Joseph Carroll, Nashila Hirji, Alfredo Dubra, Anthony G. Robson, Andrew R. Webster and Katie M. Litts. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Translational Vision Science & Technology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Genetics and UCL Discovery (University College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact