Thomas Johansen

42 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Thomas Johansen
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Philosophy 156
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 86
  • Archeology 81
  • Anthropology 73
  • History and Philosophy of Science 30
Replace Osamu Sakura with:
Osamu Sakura Japan
Andrea Borghini Italy
Leonardo da Vinci Italy
Louis Liebenberg United States
Celia M. Lombardi Argentina
Matthew B. Thompson Australia
Philip Howard Gray United States
Véronique Servais Belgium
Clair Alston‐Knox Australia
Matthew D. M. Pawley New Zealand
Thomas Johansen relative to Osamu Sakura Japan Osamu Sakura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.7×
Osamu Sakura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Johansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Johansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Johansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Johansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Johansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Johansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Johansen. The network helps show where Thomas Johansen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Johansen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Johansen Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Johansen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201689
2 200772
3 201358
4 202252
5 201251
6 202350
7 200442
8 199934
9 199820
10 201119
11 201018
12 201316
13 201913
14 201813
15 202412
16 201610
17
Cognitive performance and specific deficits in OCD symptom dimensions : II. Spatial memory and impaired recognition of visuospatial object locations
201110
18
Cognitive performance and specific deficits in OCD symptom dimensions : III. Decision-making and impairments in risky choices
20119
19 20218
20 19978

About Thomas Johansen

Thomas Johansen is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Archeology and Anthropology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (14 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers) and Maritime Navigation and Safety (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (156 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (86 citations), Archeology (81 citations), Anthropology (73 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations). Thomas Johansen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Winand H. Dittrich, Ingrid Bouwer Utne, Jon E. Swenson, Bjørn Dahle, Naomi Fineberg, Göran Cederlund, Arne Söderberg, Kjell Wallin, Tor Arne Johansen and Asgeir J. Sørensen. Their work appears in journals such as Phronesis, Frontiers in Psychology, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, The Journal of Hellenic Studies and Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact