Thomas Jahn

703 citations
24 papers · 231 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Jahn

21 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Thomas Jahn
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Instrumentation 18
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 92
  • Neurology 29
  • Computational Mathematics 2
Replace Andreas Robert Formiconi with:
Andreas Robert Formiconi Italy
Ayumu Yamashita Japan
M. Delfino Spain
Paweł Markiewicz United Kingdom
Maziar Yaesoubi United States
Lukas Snoek Netherlands
Corey Jones United States
Simon Glynn United States
Johnson GadElkarim United States
Thomas Jahn relative to Andreas Robert Formiconi Italy Andreas Robert Formiconi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Andreas Robert Formiconi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Jahn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Jahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Jahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Jahn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Jahn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Jahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Jahn. The network helps show where Thomas Jahn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Jahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Jahn Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Jahn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999113
2 199628
3 202314
4 201313
5 202111
6 200110
7 20147
8 20126
9 20226
10 20165
11 20124
12 20222
13 20182
14 20172
15 20132
16 20141
17 20241
18 20111
19 20211
20 20251

About Thomas Jahn

Thomas Jahn is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Applied Mathematics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 24 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (18 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (92 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Thomas Jahn has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marco Essig, Lothar R. Schad, Johannes Schröder, Michael V. Knopp, K. Baudendistel, Christian Richter, Tino Ullrich, Felix Voigtlaender, Frederik Wenz and Walter J. Lorenz. Their work appears in journals such as Constructive Approximation, Cortex, Journal of Complexity, NeuroImage and Journal of Approximation Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact