Daniel Harabor

2.6k citations
97 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Harabor

87 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Daniel Harabor
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.5k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 99
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 35
  • Artificial Intelligence 235
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 80
Replace Alban Grastien with:
Alban Grastien Australia
Yiteng Pan China
Hang Ma United States
Shao-Ping Lu China
Tom Schouwenaars United States
Weiping Wang China
Maram Alajlan Saudi Arabia
Zuchao Wang China
Yang Yi China
Guni Sharon United States
Daniel Harabor relative to Alban Grastien Australia Alban Grastien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Alban Grastien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Harabor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Harabor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Harabor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Harabor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Harabor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Harabor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Harabor. The network helps show where Daniel Harabor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Harabor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Harabor Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Harabor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011299
2 2019173
3 2021153
4 201484
5 202175
6 202260
7 201956
8 201954
9 202149
10 201948
11 201945
12 201639
13 202039
14 200837
15 202235
16 201334
17 202131
18 201723
19 202123
20 202123

About Daniel Harabor

Daniel Harabor is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Transportation and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (83 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (12 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (11 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (5 papers), Graph Theory and Algorithms (4 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (3 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (3 papers) and Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.5k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (99 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (35 citations), Artificial Intelligence (235 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (80 citations). Daniel Harabor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alban Grastien, Peter J. Stuckey, Jiaoyang Li, Sven Koenig, Hang Ma, Adi Botea, Graeme Gange, Zhe Chen, Javier Alonso–Mora and Xiaoshan Bai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Artificial Intelligence, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Expert Systems with Applications and Transportation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact