Thomas J. Scott

31 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Thomas J. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Library and Information Sciences 24
  • Reproductive Medicine 84
  • Equine 16
  • Environmental Chemistry 99
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 69
Replace I. A. Nicholson with:
I. A. Nicholson United Kingdom
W. Robert Houston United States
Marcy P. Osgood United States
Mark J. Hanson United States
Douglas J. Lynch United States
Robert L. Green United States
Paula J. Edwards United States
Clair Alston‐Knox Australia
Stephen Jacquemin United States
Andy Coghlan Ireland
Thomas J. Scott relative to I. A. Nicholson United Kingdom I. A. Nicholson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
I. A. Nicholson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Scott. The network helps show where Thomas J. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198975
2 198647
3 200144
4 199044
5 200740
6 200040
7 197036
8 197430
9 200128
10 199422
11 200020
12 199416
13 197615
14 197614
15 198910
16 199910
17 19778
18 19988
19 19777
20
Pathfinders Go Online.
20006

About Thomas J. Scott

Thomas J. Scott is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (24 citations), Reproductive Medicine (84 citations), Equine (16 citations), Environmental Chemistry (99 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (69 citations). Thomas J. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include James P. Shepard, E.L. Squires, L.J. Maclellan, Elaine M. Carnevale, Charles T. Driscoll, M. J. Mitchell, Myron J. Mitchell, Dudley J. Raynal, James H. Cross and R. D. Fuller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Theriogenology, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact