Thomas J. Powell

543 citations
18 papers · 367 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas J. Powell

17 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Thomas J. Powell
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • General Health Professions 224
  • Public Administration 32
  • Clinical Psychology 132
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Social Psychology 89
Replace Richard J. Goscha with:
Richard J. Goscha United States
Irene S. Levine United States
Phillip D. Akutsu United States
Vaughn A. DeCoster United States
Anne Felton United Kingdom
Scott Harris United States
Ellie Taylor Australia
Sandra N. Boersma Netherlands
Ashley Clayton United States
Jessica Storbjörk Sweden
Thomas J. Powell relative to Richard J. Goscha United States Richard J. Goscha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Richard J. Goscha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Powell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Powell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Powell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Powell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Powell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Powell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Powell. The network helps show where Thomas J. Powell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Powell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Powell Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Powell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Self-Help Organizations and Professional Practice
198778
2
Working with self-help.
199065
3 200131
4 198730
5 199928
6 199528
7 197522
8 199316
9 200013
10 199112
11 19969
12 20008
13 20138
14 19726
15 19796
16 19705
17
Interpreting Parents Anonymous as a source of help for those with child abuse problems.
19792
18 19760

About Thomas J. Powell

Thomas J. Powell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Epidemiology and Safety Research, having authored 18 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (224 citations), Public Administration (32 citations), Clinical Psychology (132 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations) and Social Psychology (89 citations). Thomas J. Powell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Linda Farris Kurtz, Kenneth R. Silk, Elizabeth M. Hill, William H. Yeaton, Charles Garvin, Gregory J. Meissen, Scott Wituk, Elizabeth Hill, David E. Pollio and Joseph J. Bookstein. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, American Journal of Community Psychology, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact