Thomas J. Carty

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Thomas J. Carty
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Pharmacology 609
  • Biochemistry 201
  • Rheumatology 214
  • Cancer Research 180
  • Physiology 49
Replace Chi‐Chung Chan with:
Chi‐Chung Chan Canada
Wanda Cromlish Canada
Elizabeth Wong Canada
Danielle Denis Canada
Carina L. Bos Netherlands
Hiromichi Fujino Japan
S. Charleson Canada
My‐Hanh Lam United States
Anders Wetterholm Sweden
Akinori Arimura Japan
Thomas J. Carty relative to Chi‐Chung Chan Canada Chi‐Chung Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Chi‐Chung Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Carty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Carty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Carty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Carty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Carty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Carty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Carty. The network helps show where Thomas J. Carty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Carty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Carty Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Carty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003471
2 1992115
3 200583
4 197070
5 198060
6 198060
7 198055
8 199149
9 197438
10 199336
11 197135
12 197434
13 200231
14 200329
15 200529
16 199629
17 200526
18 199425
19 199025
20 198724

About Thomas J. Carty

Thomas J. Carty is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Rheumatology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (12 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (7 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (5 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (4 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (609 citations), Biochemistry (201 citations), Rheumatology (214 citations), Cancer Research (180 citations) and Physiology (49 citations). Thomas J. Carty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James D. Eskra, Robert H. Abeles, Laurent Audoly, José R. Perez, Catherine E. Trebino, Bernard Babior, Francis J. Sweeney, Joseph G. Lombardino, John D. McNeish and Jeffrey L. Stock. Their work appears in journals such as Inflammation Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Prostaglandins and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact