Thomas Iber

28 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Thomas Iber
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 66
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 25
  • Developmental Neuroscience 22
  • Hepatology 23
  • Nephrology 21
Replace James D. Kindscher with:
James D. Kindscher United States
Anna Herminghaus Germany
Yafen Liang United States
Han-Ming Chen Taiwan
Stefan‐Mario Kasper Germany
R Tabata Japan
R. Demeyere Belgium
Yue Zheng China
Leon J. Marks United States
Thomas Iber relative to James D. Kindscher United States James D. Kindscher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
James D. Kindscher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Iber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Iber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Iber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Iber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Iber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Iber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Iber. The network helps show where Thomas Iber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Iber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Iber Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Iber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Tracheal intubation using the mobile C-MAC video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway.
201047
2 199731
3 200931
4 200329
5 201028
6 199928
7 199828
8 200327
9 200621
10 200016
11 200411
12 20049
13 20128
14
Xenon anesthesia impairs hepatic oxygenation and perfusion in healthy pigs.
20087
15 20087
16 20225
17 20105
18 20075
19 20125
20 20054

About Thomas Iber

Thomas Iber is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine and Nephrology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (3 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (66 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (25 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (22 citations), Hepatology (23 citations) and Nephrology (21 citations). Thomas Iber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Nöldge‐Schomburg, Kai Zacharowski, B. Šantak, Ulrich Wachter, J. Vogt, Dierk A. Vagts, Michael Georgieff, Peter Radermacher, Karl Träger and K. Geiger. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, British Journal of Pharmacology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine and Respiration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact