Thomas Hellmich

632 citations
30 papers · 404 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hellmich

28 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Thomas Hellmich
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Emergency Medicine 227
  • Emergency Medical Services 79
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 22
  • Health Information Management 15
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Nawfal Aljerian with:
Nawfal Aljerian Saudi Arabia
S. Prückner Germany
Jeff Clawson United States
Russell Migita United States
Daniel A. Hirsh United States
Mark Benson United States
Serkan Emre Eroğlu Türkiye
Renaldo C. Blocker United States
Katherine E. Law United States
Robert H. Groves United States
Thomas Hellmich relative to Nawfal Aljerian Saudi Arabia Nawfal Aljerian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Nawfal Aljerian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hellmich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hellmich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hellmich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hellmich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hellmich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hellmich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hellmich. The network helps show where Thomas Hellmich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hellmich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hellmich Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hellmich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993131
2 200767
3 201737
4 198926
5 201724
6 201523
7 202314
8 201714
9 202010
10 199210
11 20168
12 20215
13 20194
14 20184
15 20174
16 20193
17 20173
18 20193
19 20163
20 20162

About Thomas Hellmich

Thomas Hellmich is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 30 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (12 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (6 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (227 citations), Emergency Medical Services (79 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (22 citations), Health Information Management (15 citations) and Family Practice (7 citations). Thomas Hellmich has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph D. Losek, Peter W. Glaeser, Douglas S. Smith, David M. Nestler, Kalyan S. Pasupathy, William Bonadio, M. Susan Hallbeck, Mustafa Y. Sır, Marsha Finkelstein and Renaldo C. Blocker. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Emergency Medicine, AEM Education and Training, Journal of Medical Systems, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact