Thomas H. Apperley

47 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers

Thomas H. Apperley
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 279
  • Sociology and Political Science 427
  • Literature and Literary Theory 148
  • Human-Computer Interaction 36
  • Computer Science Applications 21
Replace Pilar Lacasa with:
Pilar Lacasa Spain
Susana Pajares Tosca Denmark
Joost Raessens Netherlands
Janet Horowitz Murray United States
Jonas Heide Smith Denmark
María Amor Pérez Rodríguez Spain
María Esther del Moral Pérez Spain
Becky Herr Stephenson United States
Matteo Bittanti Italy
D. Fox Harrell United States
Thomas H. Apperley relative to Pilar Lacasa Spain Pilar Lacasa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Pilar Lacasa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Apperley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Apperley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Apperley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Apperley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Apperley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Apperley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Apperley. The network helps show where Thomas H. Apperley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas H. Apperley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas H. Apperley Line = papers co-authored together Thomas H. Apperley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006340
2 201160
3 201359
4 201559
5 201256
6 201936
7 200926
8
Gaming capital: Rethinking literacy
200920
9 201819
10 201016
11 201815
12 201814
13 201313
14 202113
15
'Turning Around' to the Affordances of Digital Games: English Curriculum and Students' Lifeworlds
201512
16 201111
17 20169
18 20169
19 20208
20 20077

About Thomas H. Apperley

Thomas H. Apperley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Media Technology, Museology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 888 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (31 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (8 papers), Smart Cities and Technologies (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Media and Digital Communication (2 papers), Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics (2 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (279 citations), Sociology and Political Science (427 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (148 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (36 citations) and Computer Science Applications (21 citations). Thomas H. Apperley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Beavis, Christopher S. Walsh, Jussi Parikka, Justin Clemens, Bjørn Nansen, Souvik Mukherjee, Joanne O’Mara, Lars De Wildt, Clare Bradford and Matthew Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Culture, English in Education, Open Library of Humanities, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia and Media International Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact