Thomas Gültzow

17 papers receiving 253 citations

Thomas Gültzow's Hit Papers

Bridging the digital health divide: a narrative review of the causes, implications, and solutions for digital health inequalities 2025 · 36 citations
360Years since publication102030

Peers

Thomas Gültzow
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Virology 49
  • Health 65
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Clinical Psychology 37
  • General Health Professions 34
Replace Comfort C. Enah with:
Comfort C. Enah United States
Xin Peng China
Jennifer V. Chavez United States
Austin Zygmunt Canada
Vidya Ramachandran India
James Satriano United States
Bara’ Abdallah AlShurman Canada
Ana Laura Sica Cruzeiro Brazil
Sevil Yılmaz Türkiye
Thomas Gültzow relative to Comfort C. Enah United States Comfort C. Enah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Comfort C. Enah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gültzow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gültzow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gültzow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gültzow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gültzow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gültzow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gültzow. The network helps show where Thomas Gültzow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gültzow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gültzow Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gültzow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202056
2 202243
3
Bridging the digital health divide: a narrative review of the causes, implications, and solutions for digital health inequalities
Hit paper breakdown →
202536
4 202222
5 202221
6 202318
7 202117
8 202112
9 202111
10 20226
11 20205
12 20245
13 20203
14 20222
15 20222
16 20201
17 20241
18 20250

About Thomas Gültzow

Thomas Gültzow is a scholar working on Virology, Health, Physiology, General Health Professions and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Poxvirus research and outbreaks (4 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (1 paper), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (1 paper) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (49 citations), Health (65 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Clinical Psychology (37 citations) and General Health Professions (34 citations). Thomas Gültzow has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ciska Hoving, Kai J. Jonas, Haoyi Wang, Hanne M. L. Zimmermann, Jeanine P. D. Guidry, Francine Schneider, Eline Suzanne Smit, Hein de Vries, Carmen D. Dirksen and Laura Maria König. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Digital Health, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact