Thomas Groot

742 citations
13 papers · 392 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Groot

13 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Thomas Groot
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Insect Science 289
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 173
  • Horticulture 5
  • Plant Science 111
  • Genetics 74
Replace Patricia Landaverde‐González with:
Patricia Landaverde‐González Germany
Sylvain Guillot France
Andy Austin Australia
Anna G. Himler United States
Filipa Vala Netherlands
Peng‐Yu Jin China
Adriano Cavalleri Brazil
Alison Ravenscraft United States
Eduardo V. Trumper Argentina
Tsuguo Kohama Japan
Thomas Groot relative to Patricia Landaverde‐González Germany Patricia Landaverde‐González's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Patricia Landaverde‐González · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Groot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Groot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Groot. The network helps show where Thomas Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Groot Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Groot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2018158
2 200679
3 200365
4 200534
5 200718
6 20189
7 20198
8
The effects of symbiont induced haploid thelytoky on the evolution of brevipalpus mites
20068
9 20244
10 20244
11 20193
12
Ways to improve biocontrol of tomato russet mites using predatory mites.
20171
13
Cardinium: the next addition to the family of reproductive parasites
20111

About Thomas Groot

Thomas Groot is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers), Study of Mite Species (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (2 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 papers) and Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (289 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (173 citations), Horticulture (5 citations), Plant Science (111 citations) and Genetics (74 citations). Thomas Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Johannes A. J. Breeuwer, Markus Knapp, Y. van Houten, Ângelo Pallini, Arne Janssen, Gilberto J. de Morães, Valdenice Moreira Novelli, Marcel Dicke, Gerd Alberti and Juliana Freitas‐Astúa. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Applied Acarology, Journal of Pest Science, Biological Control, Heredity and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact