Thomas Gredig

968 citations
30 papers · 825 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Gredig

30 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

Thomas Gredig
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Condensed Matter Physics 279
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 380
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 512
  • Bioengineering 42
  • Materials Chemistry 253
Replace C. D. England with:
C. D. England United States
A. Potenza United Kingdom
Eiji Aoyagi Japan
Marco Caffio United Kingdom
Vera Marinova Bulgaria
Yasushi Iyechika Japan
Quanzhen Zhang China
Zentaro Honda Japan
Clemens Simbrunner Austria
B. Ghosh India
Thomas Gredig relative to C. D. England United States C. D. England's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. D. England · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gredig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gredig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gredig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gredig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gredig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gredig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gredig. The network helps show where Thomas Gredig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gredig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gredig Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gredig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201099
2 200788
3 200276
4 200263
5 200263
6 200658
7 200942
8 202440
9 201337
10 200332
11 201231
12 200027
13 200626
14 200926
15 200820
16 201115
17 200214
18 201513
19 201011
20 20169

About Thomas Gredig

Thomas Gredig is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 30 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (16 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (10 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (7 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (5 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (4 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (3 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (279 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (380 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (512 citations), Bioengineering (42 citations) and Materials Chemistry (253 citations). Thomas Gredig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include E. Dan Dahlberg, Iván K. Schuller, I. N. Krivorotov, Corneliu N. Colesniuc, Peter Eames, G. P. Felcher, S. G. E. te Velthuis, J. Bartolomé, F. Bartolomé and William C. Trogler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review B, Applied Physics Letters, Physical review. B. and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact