Thomas Frissen
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 5
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 3
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 2
-
- Social Media and Politics 2
- Co-authors
- Leen d’Haenens (10 shared papers)David De Coninck (2 shared papers)Olivier Champagne-Poirier (1 shared paper)Sébastien Salerno (1 shared paper)Marie-Ève Carignan (1 shared paper)Mélissa Généreux (1 shared paper)Nathalie Pignard-Cheynel (1 shared paper)Koen Matthijs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Telematics and Informatics (2 papers)Transcultural Psychiatry (1 paper)Communication Methods and Measures (1 paper)New Media & Society (1 paper)International Journal of Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Thomas Frissen
14 papers receiving 394 citations
Thomas Frissen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Health 79
- Communication 71
- Sociology and Political Science 263
- Clinical Psychology 76
- Applied Psychology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Frissen
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Frissen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Frissen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Frissen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Frissen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Frissen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Frissen. The network helps show where Thomas Frissen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Frissen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About COVID-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 218 |
| 2 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 |
About Thomas Frissen
Thomas Frissen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Health, Social Psychology and General Social Sciences, having authored 14 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (5 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper), Media Influence and Health (1 paper) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (79 citations), Communication (71 citations), Sociology and Political Science (263 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations) and Applied Psychology (13 citations). Thomas Frissen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Leen d’Haenens, David De Coninck, Olivier Champagne-Poirier, Sébastien Salerno, Marie-Ève Carignan, Mélissa Généreux, Nathalie Pignard-Cheynel, Koen Matthijs, Marc D. David and Grégoire Lits. Their work appears in journals such as Telematics and Informatics, Transcultural Psychiatry, Communication Methods and Measures, New Media & Society and International Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.