Thomas Förster

58 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Thomas Förster
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Theoretical Computer Science 16
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 118
  • History and Philosophy of Science 35
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 73
  • Geometry and Topology 40
Replace John Corcoran with:
John Corcoran United States
Benjamin Braun United States
Titu Andreescu United States
M. C. Mariani Argentina
Weigang Sun China
David W. Henderson United States
Lee Rudolph United States
Samuel L. Greitzer Netherlands
Donald A. Norton United States
Wen Li China
Thomas Förster relative to John Corcoran United States John Corcoran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.3×
John Corcoran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Förster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Förster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Förster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Förster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Förster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Förster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Förster. The network helps show where Thomas Förster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Förster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Förster Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Förster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022136
2 199555
3
FERAL — Framework for simulator coupling on requirements and architecture level
201331
4
Set Theory with a Universal Set: Exploring an Untyped Universe
199224
5 200823
6 201220
7 198318
8 202015
9 200311
10 20219
11 20058
12 20238
13 20127
14 19857
15 20037
16 19916
17 20086
18 20036
19 20206
20 19976

About Thomas Förster

Thomas Förster is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Biomedical Engineering and Information Systems, having authored 68 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (8 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (16 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (118 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (73 citations) and Geometry and Topology (40 citations). Thomas Förster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amelie Hagelauer, Ryo Nakagawa, Zachary Schaffer, V.P. Plessky, Ernest Ting-Ta Yen, Andreas Tag, Gianluca Piazza, Ken‐ya Hashimoto, Jordi Verdú and S. Inoue. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série, Theoretical Computer Science, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic and IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact