Thomas E. Powers

26 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Equine 34
  • Microbiology 113
  • Small Animals 116
  • Pharmacology 263
  • Molecular Medicine 47
Replace Jorge Oscar Errecalde with:
Jorge Oscar Errecalde Argentina
Carlos M. Cárceles Spain
G. Albarellos Argentina
C R Müntener Switzerland
G. Laber Austria
Kristina Odensvik Sweden
H.A. Elsheikh Sudan
Shao‐Kuang Chang Taiwan
E. D’Haese Belgium
J.P. Crane United States
Thomas E. Powers relative to Jorge Oscar Errecalde Argentina Jorge Oscar Errecalde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Jorge Oscar Errecalde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Powers. The network helps show where Thomas E. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986103
2 198770
3
Veterinary Drug Therapy
199466
4 197237
5 197925
6 197820
7 198420
8 197820
9 198416
10 198014
11 197513
12 19849
13 19779
14
The bioavailability, dispostion kinetics and dosage of sulphadimethoxine in dogs.
19769
15 19769
16 19778
17 19977
18 19806
19 19785
20 19774

About Thomas E. Powers

Thomas E. Powers is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Small Animals, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Animal Science and Zoology and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (11 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (3 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (3 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (34 citations), Microbiology (113 citations), Small Animals (116 citations), Pharmacology (263 citations) and Molecular Medicine (47 citations). Thomas E. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include K. J. Varma, Jean D. Powers, Patrick Adams, J. Desmond Baggot, Lloyd Davis, Steven Krakowka, Peter L. Nara, K. M. Kerr, H. Dwight Mercer and Joelle D. Powers. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Educational leadership and Research in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact