Thomas M. Ludden

5.2k citations
158 papers · 4.1k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas M. Ludden

156 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Thomas M. Ludden
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Pharmacology 599
  • Statistics and Probability 399
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 617
  • Pharmacology 531
  • Analytical Chemistry 222
Replace Carl C. Peck with:
Carl C. Peck United States
J. Robert Powell United States
B. Whiting United Kingdom
Wayne A. Colburn United States
Jeffrey R. Koup United States
Kenneth L. Melmon United States
Ferenc Folláth Switzerland
E. Niclas Jonsson Sweden
Jeffrey S. Barrett United States
Stefan Willmann Germany
Thomas M. Ludden relative to Carl C. Peck United States Carl C. Peck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Carl C. Peck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Ludden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Ludden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Ludden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Ludden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Ludden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Ludden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Ludden. The network helps show where Thomas M. Ludden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Ludden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Ludden Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Ludden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 158 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008278
2 1994250
3 1992227
4 1992141
5 1995136
6 1997134
7 1982120
8 1985106
9 197783
10 198577
11 200274
12 197973
13 198366
14 198664
15 200461
16 201057
17 198054
18 198050
19 199749
20 199249

About Thomas M. Ludden

Thomas M. Ludden is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Analytical Chemistry, Statistics and Probability and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 158 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical studies and practices (27 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (23 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (23 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (22 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (21 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (13 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (10 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (599 citations), Statistics and Probability (399 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (617 citations), Pharmacology (531 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (222 citations). Thomas M. Ludden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lewis B. Sheiner, J. L. McNay, Alexander M. M. Shepherd, Ene Ette, Stuart L. Beal, Adrian Dunne, Mats O. Karlsson, Jae Eun Ahn, M. S. Lin and Hazel Tapp. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmaceutical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact