Thomas E. Pidgeon

29 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Pidgeon
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 27
  • Genetics 15
  • Health Informatics 2
  • Surgery 51
  • Otorhinolaryngology 5
Replace Jesse D. Meaike with:
Jesse D. Meaike United States
Daniella Reis Barbosa Martelli Brazil
Cormac W. Joyce Ireland
Christopher Limb United Kingdom
Lucia Z. Diaz United States
Graham Winston United States
Michael McDermott United States
Kelly P. Schultz United States
Jill M. Huber United States
Scott Kohlert Canada
Thomas E. Pidgeon relative to Jesse D. Meaike United States Jesse D. Meaike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jesse D. Meaike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Pidgeon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Pidgeon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Pidgeon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Pidgeon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Pidgeon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Pidgeon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Pidgeon. The network helps show where Thomas E. Pidgeon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Pidgeon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Pidgeon Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Pidgeon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201632
2 201717
3 201617
4 201613
5 201513
6 201812
7 201811
8 201810
9 20158
10 20237
11 20217
12 20186
13 20176
14 20166
15 20156
16 20205
17 20225
18 20134
19 20174
20 20193

About Thomas E. Pidgeon

Thomas E. Pidgeon is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Infectious Diseases and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (27 citations), Genetics (15 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations), Surgery (51 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (5 citations). Thomas E. Pidgeon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Riaz Agha, Alexander J. Fowler, Dennis P. Orgill, Harkiran Sagoo, Daniyal J. Jafree, Mimi R. Borrelli, Martin Evans, Richard Tunstall, Reem Farwana and Xavier L Griffin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, International Journal of Surgery, International Journal of Transgender Health, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact