Patrick R. Leacock

9 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Patrick R. Leacock
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Cell Biology 125
  • Insect Science 96
  • Plant Science 283
  • Pharmacology 115
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 143
Replace Qiuxin Wu with:
Qiuxin Wu United States
Alicia Ibáñez United States
R. Watling United Kingdom
H. H. Kope Canada
Ju-Kyeong Eo South Korea
Andrew S. Methven United States
Mathieu Sauve France
Alija B. Mujic United States
Juan L. Mata United States
D. Lunghini Italy
Patrick R. Leacock relative to Qiuxin Wu United States Qiuxin Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Qiuxin Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick R. Leacock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick R. Leacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick R. Leacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick R. Leacock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick R. Leacock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick R. Leacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick R. Leacock. The network helps show where Patrick R. Leacock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick R. Leacock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick R. Leacock Line = papers co-authored together Patrick R. Leacock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2006220
2 200466
3 201622
4 201619
5
Recommended protocols for sampling macrofungi
200417
6 20038
7 20034
8
Utilizing foray records to document fungal diversity across North America
19992
9 20181

About Patrick R. Leacock

Patrick R. Leacock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Pharmacology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (7 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers), Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (1 paper) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (125 citations), Insect Science (96 citations), Plant Science (283 citations), Pharmacology (115 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (143 citations). Patrick R. Leacock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Gregory M. Mueller, John Paul Schmit, Qiuxin Wu, D. Jean Lodge, D. W. Minter, Tom W. May, Mario Rajchenberg, Dennis E. Desjardin, Bart Buyck and Joaquín Cifuentes. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, Restoration Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation, Biological Conservation and Mycologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact