Thomas E. O. Screen

894 citations
12 papers · 809 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. O. Screen

12 papers receiving 803 citations

Peers

Thomas E. O. Screen
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Materials Chemistry 644
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 92
  • Biomedical Engineering 345
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 138
  • Organic Chemistry 189
Replace Marijana Fazekas with:
Marijana Fazekas Romania
Monika Zawadzka Ireland
E.G.A. Notaras Australia
Jung Ho Kwon Japan
Emma Dahlstedt Sweden
Mitsuhiko Morisue Japan
Jonathan D. Matichak United States
Iain M. Blake United Kingdom
Tridib Sarma India
B. del Rey Spain
Thomas E. O. Screen relative to Marijana Fazekas Romania Marijana Fazekas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marijana Fazekas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. O. Screen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. O. Screen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. O. Screen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. O. Screen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. O. Screen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. O. Screen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. O. Screen. The network helps show where Thomas E. O. Screen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. O. Screen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. O. Screen Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. O. Screen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2002197
2 2006183
3 2001101
4 200284
5 200383
6 200978
7 202120
8 201519
9 200917
10 201312
11 19979
12 20206

About Thomas E. O. Screen

Thomas E. O. Screen is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (6 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (5 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (4 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (644 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (92 citations), Biomedical Engineering (345 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (138 citations) and Organic Chemistry (189 citations). Thomas E. O. Screen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Harry L. Anderson, R.G. Denning, J.R.G. Thorne, David G. Bucknall, Craig J. Wilson, Yuriy Stepanenko, Mikhail Drobizhev, Aleksander Rebane, Joseph W. Perry and Matteo Cozzuol. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Materials Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Organic Process Research & Development and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact