Thomas E. Macnamara

40 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Macnamara
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 122
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 70
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 36
  • Surgery 240
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 75
Replace S. C. Helps with:
S. C. Helps Australia
Masayuki Miyabe Japan
Andrea Paris Germany
Benton D. King United States
James C. Schadt United States
Jan Martner Sweden
Ole Næsh Denmark
MARCO GHIGNONE France
Joel O. Johnson United States
Yuka Saeki Japan
Thomas E. Macnamara relative to S. C. Helps Australia S. C. Helps's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
S. C. Helps · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Macnamara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Macnamara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Macnamara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Macnamara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Macnamara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Macnamara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Macnamara. The network helps show where Thomas E. Macnamara may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Macnamara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Macnamara Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Macnamara links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981129
2 198051
3 198236
4 198232
5 198231
6 198531
7 198027
8 197824
9 197322
10 197922
11 198121
12 198119
13 198416
14 198015
15 198014
16 198114
17 197913
18
Celiac plexus block: diagnostic and therapeutic applications in abdominal pain.
198012
19 198112
20 198412

About Thomas E. Macnamara

Thomas E. Macnamara is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (13 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (12 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers) and Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (122 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (70 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (36 citations), Surgery (240 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (75 citations). Thomas E. Macnamara has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Eric Lees, William Edward Bunney, David Pickar, Martin R. Cohen, Woo Young Park, Joan M. Bull, Young D. Kim, Russell T. Wall, Michel Y. Dubois and Jacqueline Whang‐Peng. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Life Sciences and Cardiovascular Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact