Thomas E. Gates

770 citations
34 papers · 608 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Gates

34 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Mechanics of Materials 266
  • Polymers and Plastics 121
  • Materials Chemistry 264
  • General Materials Science 17
  • Mechanical Engineering 124
Replace Shih-Chin Chang with:
Shih-Chin Chang Taiwan
Jianqing Liu China
Nagarajan Balasubramanian India
John R. Porter United States
David W. Hansen United States
Marion F. Mecklenburg United States
Chenyang Zhu China
Masaaki Matsubara Japan
Richard E. Brooks United Kingdom
Chao Xiong China
Thomas E. Gates relative to Shih-Chin Chang Taiwan Shih-Chin Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Shih-Chin Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Gates. The network helps show where Thomas E. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Gates Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005186
2 200244
3 198725
4 200324
5 200223
6 200323
7 197523
8 200821
9 200320
10 200520
11 200120
12 199919
13 200617
14 200417
15 200515
16 199112
17 198710
18 200110
19 200210
20 20069

About Thomas E. Gates

Thomas E. Gates is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, General Materials Science and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (11 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (10 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (5 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (4 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (4 papers), Material Properties and Applications (3 papers), Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures (3 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (266 citations), Polymers and Plastics (121 citations), Materials Chemistry (264 citations), General Materials Science (17 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (124 citations). Thomas E. Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Gregory M. Odegard, Sarah-Jane Frankland, Thomas C. Clancy, Ronald W. Davies, Karen S. Whitley, Jeffrey A. Hinkley, Donald J. Baird, Michael A. Grayson, Theodore F. Johnson and Roberta G. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Composites Science and Technology, Hydrobiologia, Engineering Failure Analysis and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact