Thomas Dunn

3.8k citations
80 papers · 2.3k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Dunn

74 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Dunn
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 1.3k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 294
  • Small Animals 188
  • Genetics 679
  • Reproductive Medicine 171
Replace L. D. Young with:
L. D. Young United States
Barry G. England United States
Deborah H. Olster United States
Andrew Rowan United States
R. M. Enns United States
Hiroyuki Suzuki Japan
Susan Alexander United States
Trevor J Heath Australia
Margaret White United States
Yvette Huet United States
Thomas Dunn relative to L. D. Young United States L. D. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
L. D. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dunn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dunn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dunn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dunn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dunn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dunn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dunn. The network helps show where Thomas Dunn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Dunn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Dunn Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Dunn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975177
2 1969149
3
Nutrition and the postpartum interval of the ewe, sow and cow.
1980128
4 1992111
5 199996
6 197480
7 201772
8 202168
9 197467
10 197266
11 197864
12 201659
13 198358
14 198258
15 198358
16 197456
17 198255
18 202253
19 198252
20 201950

About Thomas Dunn

Thomas Dunn is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Animal Science and Zoology and Education, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (25 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (11 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (4 papers) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (1.3k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (294 citations), Small Animals (188 citations), Genetics (679 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (171 citations). Thomas Dunn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include C. C. Kaltenbach, William J. Murdoch, L.R. Corah, G. E. Moss, R. E. Short, R. B. Staigmiller, Robert E. Lushene, Harold F. O’Neil, J. Ν. Wiltbank and J. E. Ingalls. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Biology of Reproduction, Theriogenology, Domestic Animal Endocrinology and Educational Technology Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact