Thomas Denk
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
- Paleontology top 2%
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 76
- Plant and animal studies 18
- Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies 12
- Paleontology 25
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils 15
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Guido W. Grimm (30 shared papers)Friđgeir Grímsson (28 shared papers)Reinhard Zetter (23 shared papers)Johannes M. Bouchal (25 shared papers)Tuncay H. Güner (16 shared papers)Vera Hemleben (4 shared papers)Maria Владимировна Tekleva (2 shared papers)Leifur A. Símonarson (10 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Denk
117 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
- Paleontology 513
- Atmospheric Science 710
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 455
- Ecological Modeling 133
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Denk
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Denk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Denk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Denk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Denk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Denk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Denk. The network helps show where Thomas Denk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Denk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 167 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 106 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 97 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 84 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 83 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 83 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 77 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 73 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 71 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 71 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 67 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 65 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 64 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 64 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 62 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 61 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 59 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 52 |
About Thomas Denk
Thomas Denk is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 121 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (76 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (30 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (29 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (15 papers), Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (12 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (11 papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations), Paleontology (513 citations), Atmospheric Science (710 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (455 citations) and Ecological Modeling (133 citations). Thomas Denk has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Guido W. Grimm, Friđgeir Grímsson, Reinhard Zetter, Johannes M. Bouchal, Tuncay H. Güner, Vera Hemleben, Maria Владимировна Tekleva, Leifur A. Símonarson, Zlatko Kvaček and Andrew L. Hipp. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, American Journal of Botany, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Plant Systematics and Evolution and International Journal of Plant Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.