Thomas Dehmel

1.5k citations
38 papers · 998 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Dehmel

38 papers receiving 989 citations

Peers

Thomas Dehmel
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 287
  • Neurology 215
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 197
  • Developmental Neuroscience 38
  • Neurology 73
Replace Jennifer L. Berard with:
Jennifer L. Berard Canada
Kuniko Kohyama Japan
Stefanie Gaupp Germany
Michael Cossoy Canada
Sarah Floris Netherlands
Yoshinobu Okuda Japan
Mariola Matysiak Poland
Sharon A. Sagan United States
Zhu Xu China
Kristóf Égervári Switzerland
Thomas Dehmel relative to Jennifer L. Berard Canada Jennifer L. Berard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jennifer L. Berard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dehmel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dehmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dehmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dehmel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dehmel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dehmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dehmel. The network helps show where Thomas Dehmel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Dehmel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Dehmel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Dehmel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012106
2 201579
3 201468
4 201167
5 200256
6 201254
7 200845
8 201137
9 200937
10 200633
11 200732
12 201332
13 201131
14 201028
15 201428
16 200728
17 200923
18 201423
19 201320
20 201318

About Thomas Dehmel

Thomas Dehmel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (6 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (3 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (287 citations), Neurology (215 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (197 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (38 citations) and Neurology (73 citations). Thomas Dehmel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bernd C. Kieseier, Anne K. Mausberg, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Mark Stettner, Gerd Meyer zu Hörste, Jutta Gärtner, Verena I. Leussink, Heinz Wiendl, Clemens Warnke and Olaf Stüve. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Journal of Neuroimmunology, PLoS ONE, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology and Journal of Neuroinflammation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact