Thomas Db

540 citations
28 papers · 476 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Db

25 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Thomas Db
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Reproductive Medicine 88
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 57
  • Developmental Neuroscience 23
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 79
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
Replace Richard F. Hoyt with:
Richard F. Hoyt United States
A Riva Italy
Pedro Moreira Portugal
Brigitte Benzacken France
Emily Niemitz United States
C Oberti United States
Yufen Xie United States
Marion Pope United Kingdom
Mariet W. Elting Netherlands
M.B. Nikitovitch-Winer United States
Thomas Db relative to Richard F. Hoyt United States Richard F. Hoyt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Richard F. Hoyt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Db

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Db's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Db with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Db more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Db

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Db. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Db. The network helps show where Thomas Db may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Db, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Db Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Db links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Changes in the dendritic organization of neurons in the cerebral cortex following deafferentation.
1962123
2
Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and risk of endometrial cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
199171
3
Relationship of oral contraceptives to cervical carcinogenesis.
197254
4
Epithelial ovarian cancer and combined oral contraceptives. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
198945
5
Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
199228
6
The influence of grass cover on runoff and soil erosion from soils in the Machakos area, Kenya.
197920
7
Endometrial cancer and combined oral contraceptives. The Who Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
198817
8
The differentiation of transplanted haematopoietic cells derived from bone marrow, spleen and fetal liver.
197116
9
Epidemiologic studies of cancer in minority groups in the western United States.
197914
10
Combined oral contraceptives and liver cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
198914
11
Tamm-Horsfall protein: an aetiological agent in tubulointerstitial disease?
199412
12
Breast cancer and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
198511
13
Hormones and hormone receptors in the etiology of breast cancer.
198610
14
Invasive cervical cancer and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.
19859
15
Metaphase accumulation in tumour isografts following the administration of colcemid, vinblastine or vincristine.
19728
16
A review of the Nearctic species of the genus Banasa Stal (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).
19815
17
Spontaneous recovery in the thymus after supra-lethal whole-body x-irradiation.
19673
18
Experimental tooth transplantation in the mouse.
19703
19
The phase III clinical evaluation of LAAM: I. Comparative epidemiology of mortality in LAAM and methadone.
19793
20
Cancer incidence in Caucasians living in the Pacific Basin.
19852

About Thomas Db

Thomas Db is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 28 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (1 paper) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (88 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (57 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (23 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (79 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (109 citations). Thomas Db has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Tanzania and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Linda R. Noonan, Anna Whitehead, Williams Jd, Junfeng Chu, Michael J. Cork and Anne McTiernan. Their work appears in journals such as Contraception, Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, Tropical Agriculture and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact