Thomas D. Smith

14 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 35
  • Infectious Diseases 72
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36
Replace Ronald Thomas with:
Ronald Thomas United States
Thomas R. McCune United States
Wim Adriaensen Belgium
Vincent Gulmans Netherlands
Kathy Taylor Germany
Mini E. Jacob United States
George Panayiotakopoulos Greece
Joaquim Monteiro Portugal
Chan Yiong Huak Singapore
Melissa Mazor United States
Thomas D. Smith relative to Ronald Thomas United States Ronald Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Ronald Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1996105
2
Retention of 113mIn-59Fe-ferric hydroxide in the mouse.
197177
3 198776
4
Are Low Real Interest Rates Here to Stay
201857
5 199546
6 198936
7 201331
8 198516
9 199614
10
Development of ocular hypertension in congenitally buphthalmic rabbits.
199512
11 198810
12 19789
13 19813
14 20241

About Thomas D. Smith

Thomas D. Smith is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 14 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Sports Performance and Training (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (1 paper) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (35 citations), Infectious Diseases (72 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (36 citations). Thomas D. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Łukasz Rachel, W. Charles Huskins, Peggy S. Gott, Jorge Correale, Adrián L. Rabinowicz, Christi Heck, Christopher M. DeGiorgio, Susan L. R. Barker, G. Bruno and E. A. Gusmano. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, PLoS ONE, The American Journal of Cardiology, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology and International journal of central banking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact