Thomas Crowther
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 4
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Historical Philosophy and Science 1
- Co-authors
- Edward T. Bullmore (1 shared paper)Robert M. Bilder (1 shared paper)Michael Brammer (1 shared paper)Anthony S. David (1 shared paper)Susan D. Iversen (1 shared paper)Gemma A. Calvert (1 shared paper)Steven Williams (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ratio (1 paper)Erkenntnis (1 paper)Inquiry (1 paper)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Thomas Crowther
9 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Thomas Crowther's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Behavioral Neuroscience 136
- Cognitive Neuroscience 728
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 435
- Sensory Systems 75
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 148
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Crowther
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Crowther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Crowther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Crowther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Crowther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Crowther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Crowther. The network helps show where Thomas Crowther may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Crowther, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Society for Neuroscience Abstracts Hit paper breakdown → | 1997 | 1150 |
| 2 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 3 | The matter of events | 2011 | 21 |
| 4 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 0 |
About Thomas Crowther
Thomas Crowther is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (1 paper), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper), Social Representations and Identity (1 paper), Emile Durkheim and Sociology (1 paper) and Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (136 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (728 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (435 citations), Sensory Systems (75 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (148 citations). Thomas Crowther has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Edward T. Bullmore, Robert M. Bilder, Michael Brammer, Anthony S. David, Susan D. Iversen, Gemma A. Calvert and Steven Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Ratio, Erkenntnis, Inquiry, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.