Thomas Corbett

13 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Thomas Corbett
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Public Administration 20
  • Gender Studies 48
  • Management Science and Operations Research 44
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
Replace Richard Maclure with:
Richard Maclure Canada
Rebecca Cassells Australia
Ariadna Munté Pascual Spain
Stephen P. Stelzner United States
Amber Gazso Canada
Gemma M. Carney Ireland
Anjali Dutt United States
Siddhartha Baviskar Denmark
Janet Ransley Australia
Naomi Nichols Canada
Thomas Corbett relative to Richard Maclure Canada Richard Maclure's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard Maclure · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Corbett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Corbett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Corbett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Corbett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Corbett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Corbett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Corbett. The network helps show where Thomas Corbett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Corbett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Corbett Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Corbett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers
2010104
2 201063
3 201247
4 201923
5 202118
6
Changing family formation behavior through welfare reform.
199815
7 20033
8 20133
9
Modern American poetry
19613
10 19852
11 19792
12 19682
13 19951
14 19901
15 20011
16 20111
17 20210
18 20210
19 20210

About Thomas Corbett

Thomas Corbett is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Management Science and Operations Research, Demography and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (20 citations), Gender Studies (48 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (44 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations). Thomas Corbett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Bogenschneider, Theodora Ooms, Olivia M. Little, Jennifer E. Mosley, Rebecca Maynard, Gary D. Sandefur, Anne Biringer, Vyta Senikas, Robert Gagnon and Louise Duperron. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Theological Quarterly, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Social Policy and Society, Family Relations and Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact