Thomas Collier

67 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Pharmaceutical Science 680
  • Organic Chemistry 599
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 456
  • Inorganic Chemistry 245
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 40
Replace Allen F. Brooks with:
Allen F. Brooks United States
Mickaël Huiban United Kingdom
Christophe Génicot Belgium
Benjamin H. Rotstein Canada
Sean Preshlock United States
Lisheng Cai United States
Stefan Gruber Switzerland
Hélène Audrain Denmark
Erik Årstad United Kingdom
Tor Kihlberg Sweden
Thomas Collier relative to Allen F. Brooks United States Allen F. Brooks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Allen F. Brooks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Collier. The network helps show where Thomas Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Collier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013174
2 2016135
3 201599
4 198699
5 201491
6 201377
7 201273
8 200667
9 199756
10 201153
11 201749
12 200742
13 199741
14 201536
15 201435
16 201335
17 199634
18 201433
19 201528
20 199727

About Thomas Collier

Thomas Collier is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pharmaceutical Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (14 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (11 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (11 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (9 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (7 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (7 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (680 citations), Organic Chemistry (599 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (456 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (245 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (40 citations). Thomas Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rikki N. Waterhouse, Matthew Tredwell, Véronique Gouverneur, Neil Vasdev, Steven H. Liang, John W. ApSimon, Samuel Calderwood, Stefan Verhoog, Jan Passchier and Mickaël Huiban. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Chemical Communications, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact