Thomas Clavier

91 papers receiving 872 citations

Peers

Thomas Clavier
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 61
  • Emergency Medicine 59
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 46
  • Health Informatics 12
  • General Dentistry 2
Replace Ji Won Yoo with:
Ji Won Yoo United States
Philippe L. Couillard Canada
Michael Heßler Germany
Jennifer R. Simpson United States
Adam Joseph Dugan United States
Gu Hyun Kang South Korea
Sasha D. Adams United States
Andrea Marudi Italy
Jaume Mesquida Spain
Evren Şentürk Türkiye
Thomas Clavier relative to Ji Won Yoo United States Ji Won Yoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Ji Won Yoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Clavier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Clavier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Clavier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Clavier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Clavier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Clavier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Clavier. The network helps show where Thomas Clavier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Clavier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Clavier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Clavier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202253
2 201939
3 201538
4 201634
5 202133
6 201732
7 201931
8 202030
9 202330
10 201927
11 201625
12 202023
13 201722
14 202122
15 202221
16 202020
17 202219
18 201417
19 202117
20 202116

About Thomas Clavier

Thomas Clavier is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Surgery, having authored 112 papers that have together received 895 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (6 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (61 citations), Emergency Medicine (59 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (46 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations) and General Dentistry (2 citations). Thomas Clavier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Besnier, Vincent Compère, Benoît Veber, B. Dureuil, Jean Selim, Hélène Castel, Fabienne Tamion, Zoé Demailly, Pierre‐Olivier Guichet and Mohamad El Amki. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Frontiers in Medicine, Critical Care, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Neurogastroenterology & Motility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact