Thomas Chapman

57 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

Thomas Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Insect Science 421
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 432
  • Genetics 234
  • Ecological Modeling 32
  • Ecology 159
Replace R. Cruickshank with:
R. Cruickshank United Kingdom
Ferenc Lakatos Hungary
Andrea Harnos Hungary
Frank Bernhard Kraus Germany
G. W. Wharton United States
H. R. Smith United Kingdom
Gonghua Lin China
Ibrahim Helmy Egypt
Aung Lin United States
Derek Roberts Oman
Thomas Chapman relative to R. Cruickshank United Kingdom R. Cruickshank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
R. Cruickshank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Chapman. The network helps show where Thomas Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997114
2 2015105
3 202073
4 200761
5
Adaptive divergence in contiguous populations of Darwin's Small Ground Finch (Geospiza fuliginosa)
200657
6 201651
7 201933
8 199830
9 201925
10 200725
11 201125
12 202025
13 200425
14 201224
15 201523
16 200823
17 199622
18 200122
19 201422
20 201219

About Thomas Chapman

Thomas Chapman is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Surgery and Plant Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (24 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (13 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (4 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (421 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (432 citations), Genetics (234 citations), Ecological Modeling (32 citations) and Ecology (159 citations). Thomas Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bernard J. Crespi, Catherine M. Little, N. Kirk Hillier, Michael P. Schwarz, Umraz Khan, Michael McLeish, John Mathews, Thomas C. Wright, Sonia Kleindorfer and Frank J. Sulloway. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Journal of Medical Entomology and Journal of Insect Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact