Thomas Carroll DeVore

52 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Thomas Carroll DeVore
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Catalysis 99
  • Inorganic Chemistry 156
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 269
  • Materials Chemistry 317
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 56
Replace Zhenwen Fu with:
Zhenwen Fu United States
Sergey Ph. Ruzankin Russia
Keisuke Miyakubo Japan
Holmann V. Brand United States
Luis J. Smith United States
A. G. Pelmenschikov Russia
Keijiro Ohshimo Japan
Frank Haase Germany
P.P. Edwards United Kingdom
Lary A. Curtiss United States
Thomas Carroll DeVore relative to Zhenwen Fu United States Zhenwen Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Zhenwen Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Carroll DeVore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Carroll DeVore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Carroll DeVore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Carroll DeVore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Carroll DeVore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Carroll DeVore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Carroll DeVore. The network helps show where Thomas Carroll DeVore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Carroll DeVore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Carroll DeVore Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Carroll DeVore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197950
2 197846
3 197429
4 199129
5 197827
6 198727
7 197824
8 197923
9 201821
10 197621
11 197919
12 201618
13 199718
14 200818
15 197617
16 197617
17 199115
18 198415
19 202213
20 200713

About Thomas Carroll DeVore

Thomas Carroll DeVore is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (8 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (8 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (6 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (6 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (5 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (99 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (156 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (269 citations), Materials Chemistry (317 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (56 citations). Thomas Carroll DeVore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Thomas N. Gallaher, R. J. Van Zee, William Weltner, James L. Gole, Barbara A. Reisner, H.F. Franzen, V. Calder, James L. Slater, Ana C. Morales and Jonathan Roger Woodward. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics, Inorganic Chemistry and Chemistry of Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact