Thomas C. Walker

13 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Development 28
  • Political Science and International Relations 105
  • Economics and Econometrics 87
  • Sociology and Political Science 83
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12
Replace Frederick Merk with:
Frederick Merk United States
John Berryman United Kingdom
Raymond Westbrook United States
Marc Van De Mieroop United States
Cho-yün Hsü United States
Onno M. van Nijf France
Robert L. Backus
Scott Mandelbrote United Kingdom
Frank J. Frost United States
James F. Searing United States
Thomas C. Walker relative to Frederick Merk United States Frederick Merk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Frederick Merk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Walker. The network helps show where Thomas C. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200593
2 201033
3 200029
4 198020
5 198420
6 197920
7 200517
8 200814
9 19758
10 20174
11 19803
12 20163
13
Computer automation of ultrasonic testing
19742
14 20100
15 20130

About Thomas C. Walker

Thomas C. Walker is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology and Urban Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (6 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (2 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (28 citations), Political Science and International Relations (105 citations), Economics and Econometrics (87 citations), Sociology and Political Science (83 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (12 citations). Thomas C. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin O. Fordham, T. U. Biber, Charles O. Watlington, Daniel E. Sonenshine, Bennett L. Elisberg, Arthur S. Brill, David Rousseau, Elizabeth Crouch, Lori Dickes and Meredith Reid Sarkees. Their work appears in journals such as International Studies Quarterly, The Journal of Membrane Biology, Perspectives on Politics, Molecular Physics and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact