Thomas C. Mann

1.1k citations
25 papers · 511 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Mann

25 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Mann
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Applied Psychology 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Social Psychology 194
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Gender Studies 57
Replace Natalie A. Wyer with:
Natalie A. Wyer United Kingdom
Jillian K. Swencionis United States
Rick van Baaren Netherlands
Rebecca Dyer United States
Maria Rosaria Cadinu Italy
Thomas Lee Budesheim United States
Thijs Verwijmeren Netherlands
Silvia Krauth‐Gruber France
Jason Chin Australia
Senel Husnu United Kingdom
Thomas C. Mann relative to Natalie A. Wyer United Kingdom Natalie A. Wyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Natalie A. Wyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Mann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Mann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Mann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Mann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Mann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Mann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Mann. The network helps show where Thomas C. Mann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Mann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Mann Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Mann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201588
2 202187
3 201963
4 201638
5 201933
6 201928
7 201922
8 201621
9 201921
10 201116
11 198116
12 201415
13
Rethinking duality: Criticisms and ways forward.
201414
14 20229
15 19687
16 20207
17 20165
18 20213
19 20163
20 20183

About Thomas C. Mann

Thomas C. Mann is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations), Social Psychology (194 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations) and Gender Studies (57 citations). Thomas C. Mann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Melissa J. Ferguson, Benedek Kurdi, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Tessa Elizabeth Sadie Charlesworth, Jeremy Cone, Thomas Gilovich, Brianna Heggeseth, Lee H. Silbert, Matt E. Jaremko and Michael Wojnowicz. Their work appears in journals such as Social Psychological and Personality Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact