Thomas C. Grey

998 citations
30 papers · 248 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Grey

25 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Grey
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Law 133
  • Political Science and International Relations 120
  • Animal Science and Zoology 25
  • Economics and Econometrics 56
  • Sociology and Political Science 64
Replace Robert Filmer with:
Robert Filmer United States
Louis Michael Seidman United States
Thomas A. Spragens United States
Monroe H. Freedman United States
Jonathan Crowe Australia
Geoff Gilbert United Kingdom
Carlos Fico Brazil
Jean Porter United States
Antoon de Baets Netherlands
Abdullah Yusuf Ali United States
Thomas C. Grey relative to Robert Filmer United States Robert Filmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Robert Filmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Grey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Grey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Grey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Grey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Grey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Grey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Grey. The network helps show where Thomas C. Grey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Grey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Grey Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Grey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197543
2 197831
3 198431
4 197426
5 198924
6 200312
7 200311
8 19918
9 19737
10 20146
11 19966
12 20015
13 19765
14
Molecular Motions: The Holmesian Judge in Theory and Practice
19954
15 19924
16 19924
17 19803
18
The Malthusian Constitution
19863
19
Plotting The Path of Law
19972
20
The Uses of an Unwritten Constitution
19882

About Thomas C. Grey

Thomas C. Grey is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (133 citations), Political Science and International Relations (120 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (25 citations), Economics and Econometrics (56 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (64 citations). Thomas C. Grey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John M. Jones, David S. Robinson, J.M. Rawls, Reva Siegel, Judith Butler, Robert C. Post, Neil Duxbury, Steven L. Winter, Cynthia Fuchs Epstein and Robert Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Stanford Law Review, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, The Journal of Higher Education, The Yale Law Journal and Social Philosophy and Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact