Jonathan Crowe
Impact in
- Law top 5%
- Evolving Legal Systems and Governance
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Reformed Theology and Governance
Papers in
- Law 25
- Philosophy 20
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
- Reformed Theology and Governance 6
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5
- Co-authors
- Rachael Field (5 shared papers)Helen Partridge (3 shared papers)Nigel E. Simmonds (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Issues in Criminal Justice (1 paper)Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1 paper)Modern Law Review (1 paper)Philosophy Compass (1 paper)Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesArgentina
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Crowe
45 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Law 64
- Philosophy 54
- Political Science and International Relations 79
- Gender Studies 18
- Sociology and Political Science 64
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Crowe. The network helps show where Jonathan Crowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Crowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 18 | Two Models of Mediation Ethics | 2017 | 4 |
| 19 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 4 |
About Jonathan Crowe
Jonathan Crowe is a scholar working on Law, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 58 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (12 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Legal and Social Philosophy (8 papers), Reformed Theology and Governance (6 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (5 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers) and Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (64 citations), Philosophy (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (79 citations), Gender Studies (18 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (64 citations). Jonathan Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Rachael Field, Helen Partridge and Nigel E. Simmonds. Their work appears in journals such as Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Modern Law Review, Philosophy Compass and Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.