Thomas C. Bozza

3.2k citations
28 papers · 2.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Bozza

26 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Thomas C. Bozza
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Sensory Systems 2.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 1.3k
  • Biomedical Engineering 503
  • Developmental Neuroscience 40
Replace Johannes Reisert with:
Johannes Reisert United States
Takashi Kurahashi Japan
Roberto Tirindelli Italy
Kevin M. Franks United States
Nathan E. Schoppa United States
Hitoshi Sakano Japan
Hartwig Spors Germany
G. M. Shepherd United States
Susan L. Sullivan United States
Dinu F. Albeanu United States
Thomas C. Bozza relative to Johannes Reisert United States Johannes Reisert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Johannes Reisert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Bozza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Bozza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Bozza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Bozza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Bozza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Bozza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Bozza. The network helps show where Thomas C. Bozza may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Bozza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Bozza Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Bozza links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002346
2 2004288
3 2004259
4 2000212
5 2011185
6 2013172
7 2009162
8 2012116
9 1998102
10 2013101
11 201190
12 201384
13 201869
14 202150
15 201448
16 201233
17 201931
18 201829
19 200129
20 201920

About Thomas C. Bozza

Thomas C. Bozza is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (27 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (23 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (18 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Marine Toxins and Detection Methods (1 paper), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (1 paper) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (2.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.8k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (503 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (40 citations). Thomas C. Bozza has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Peter Mombaerts, Paul G. Feinstein, Dmitry A. Rinberg, Rodrigo Pacifico, Iván Rodríguez, Adam Dewan, Matt Wachowiak, Anne Vassalli, John P. McGann and Jingji Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Current Biology, Neuron, Cell and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact