Thomas C. Allison

1.8k citations
58 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Allison

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas C. Allison
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 772
  • Spectroscopy 339
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 99
  • Electrochemistry 61
  • Catalysis 65
Replace Jérôme Cuny with:
Jérôme Cuny France
Radu Iftimie Canada
Alexey L. Kaledin United States
Federico Giberti Switzerland
Ondřej Maršálek Czechia
Jorge M. del Campo Mexico
Shaohong Li China
Jianyi Ma China
Asim Najibi Australia
Daniel Peláez France
Thomas C. Allison relative to Jérôme Cuny France Jérôme Cuny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jérôme Cuny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Allison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Allison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Allison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Allison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Allison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Allison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Allison. The network helps show where Thomas C. Allison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Allison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Allison Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Allison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996104
2 199698
3 199872
4 199765
5 199664
6 201560
7 199857
8 200252
9 200044
10 201543
11 200036
12 201233
13 201229
14 202128
15 200726
16 201926
17 200026
18 201125
19 201125
20 200124

About Thomas C. Allison

Thomas C. Allison is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electrochemistry, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (25 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (15 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (7 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (7 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (6 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (5 papers) and Free Radicals and Antioxidants (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (772 citations), Spectroscopy (339 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (99 citations), Electrochemistry (61 citations) and Catalysis (65 citations). Thomas C. Allison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Donald G. Truhlar, David W. Schwenke, YuYe J. Tong, Steven L. Mielke, Maria S. Topaler, Gillian C. Lynch, Mark S. Gordon, Donald R. Burgess, Orkid Coskuner‐Weber and Oksana Zaluzhna. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Computer Physics Communications and ChemPhysChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact