Thomas Bothner

467 citations
22 papers · 159 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Bothner

21 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

Thomas Bothner
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Statistics and Probability 111
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 36
  • Mathematical Physics 81
  • Applied Mathematics 50
  • Geometry and Topology 38
Replace Christian Webb with:
Christian Webb Finland
Yacin Ameur Sweden
Nina Holden United States
Philippe Sosoe United States
Doug Pickrell United States
Guus Regts Netherlands
Jacob S. Christiansen Denmark
Jonathan Novak United States
Alin Bostan France
Benjamin Landon United States
Thomas Bothner relative to Christian Webb Finland Christian Webb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Christian Webb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bothner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bothner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bothner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bothner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bothner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bothner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bothner. The network helps show where Thomas Bothner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bothner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bothner Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bothner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201728
2 202118
3 201517
4 201916
5
202112
6 201612
7 20129
8 20189
9 20198
10 20146
11 20185
12 20234
13 20124
14 20142
15 20242
16 20222
17
On the asymptotic behavior of a log gas in the bulk scaling limit in the presence of a varying external potential I. The oscillatory region
20141
18 20181
19 20241
20 20221

About Thomas Bothner

Thomas Bothner is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Random Matrices and Applications (17 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (4 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (4 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (4 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (4 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (3 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (111 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (36 citations), Mathematical Physics (81 citations), Applied Mathematics (50 citations) and Geometry and Topology (38 citations). Thomas Bothner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert Buckingham, Alexander Its, Marco Bertola, Peter D. Miller, Pavel Bleher, Igor Krasovsky, Percy Deift, W. Lloyd Warner, Jinho Baik and Werner Balser. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Random Matrices Theory and Application, Nonlinearity, Duke Mathematical Journal and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact